Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
guys we must preserve the battle functionality of the rorqual at the cost of making it unsuitable for every possible task it actually excelled at by castrating its jump range
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.13 22:51:37
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sexy Cakes wrote: Quote: intended to ease some of the concerns around WH power projection without negatively impacting wormhole residents or eliminating the ability of Nullsec entities to roam through wormholes. in a post phoebe world po...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.13 18:56:45
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Rowells wrote: Are havens unique with escalations or drops? Everyone wants to be doing Havens/Sanctums to get the 10/10 escalation nah
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.12 23:18:40
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Yes, that is exactly what I said - those sites belong to the Sov holder if they can defend them. The reason they are in the game in the first place is to be something players can fight over. So go out...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.10 19:17:28
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
yeah i can see like conquerable stations (read: stations in systems like NOL and VFK that are not player dropped outposts) in regions getting mission agents maybe? that would be a one time expenditure of effort and give some life back to stations ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.10 16:11:50
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
there is also a bunch of technical debt that prevents them from easily adding new mission agents, iirc it is a 100% manual process and with outposts being droppable by anyone at any time i don't think they wanna pay an intern to sit and F5 dotlan ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.10 14:45:35
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kenneth Feld wrote: That being said, we will pretty much do whatever the **** we want to do except win supercap battles or headshot vfk
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 23:54:58
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
kai il wrote: I remember when CCP said "we think wormholes are in a good spot and probably the most balanced part of space" then ccp started to change it and it all went down hill and now we have A giant krab empire in highclass with no fights ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 18:27:25
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: blue donut lmbo
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:40:05
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
basically the whole post is fundamentally flawed and it only takes a few SNIPES from the periphery to reveal it as unfounded garbage
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:19:44
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
also the idea of a cynojammer meaning anything in deklein is hilarious because approximately 2% of deklein is reachable from adjacent NPC space at a 5LY range, which means the only things that can even attack into deklein are blops (drops), which ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:18:54
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kenneth Feld wrote: Cpt Buckshot wrote: Once again Eve pulls a fast one on there dedicated player base. So many of these comments are spot on, I really do not need to add anything. Except that my comments would not be positive and prob would...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:06:32
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
"if goons benefit even a little from a change then the change is fundamentally flawed and i must spite my face by cutting off my nose"
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:04:53
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Orca Platypus wrote: How surprising, another gewn buff. 20 Nyxgewnbots ratting in a cynojammed pocket in now officially a thing. I thought CCP will never go through with the gewn proposal of more anoms, I believed that much favor was ridiculo...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:02:59
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: So all those soon to be ok systems in Branch (that might see 1 person active in them a day) are still off the table without a blue tick next to your name.. Shame - that space could be put to good use by smaller groups. i mea...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:01:29
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
davet517 wrote: Stop making null-sec richer and safer, ffs. It's already too rich, and it's already too safe. highsec incursions
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:00:35
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
boy howdy the first thing i think of when approaching the problem of eve retention rate is making more mining activities
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 03:14:03
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ms Michigan wrote: MINING activity Ms Michigan wrote: get those subscriber numbers back up ummmmmmmm
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 03:02:56
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: One big enough to have active members in all (read: spread out over most) of the systems they own. That can be 100 or 100,000, it depends how many systems they are trying to hold. A hundred (active) guys could likely hold a ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.05 22:07:47
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: That's a LOT of iskies in moon goo that most line members never get to touch. please tell us how alliance finances are run
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.05 21:42:24
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |